Debt Settlement Blog

Debt Relief Solutions, News and Advice for Saving Money
February 9, 2009

Debt Relief and TARP Talk

Author: admin - Categories: Debt Relief Articles, Debt Settlement News, Financial News

As bad as things have been for U.S. banks over the past year, things could actually be taking a turn for the worse. The Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke, said Tuesday during a speech at the London School of Economics that the stimulus package now being planned by the Obama administration will not be enough by itself to turn the economy around and that “more capital injections and guarantees may become necessary to ensure stability and the normalization of credit markets.”

It looks like Bernanke has made an economic policy break from the new administration, because he appears to be warning Mr. Obama and Congressional Democrats that most of the remaining $350 billion, or possibly even more, has to go to shoring up banks if they are to resume lending at normal levels.

Here’s the problem; Congress already feels it got “burned” when out-going Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson changed the focus of the TARP from purchasing troubled assets to a recapitalization program. It isn’t likely the Congress will be willing to release the second half of the $700 billion without assurances from the new administration that a large portion of the proceeds will be used to directly support homeowners.

Indeed, according to the New York Times, “Mr. Obama and his economic team have assured Congress that they would use a sizable chunk of the new money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program to help distressed homeowners refinance mortgages and escape foreclosure, “ and that Lawrence Summers, who will head the new administration’s National Economic Council, actually “assured Democratic lawmakers in writing on Monday that the administration would use some of the money to help reduce foreclosures.”

It appears as if Nouriel Roubini’s prediction that credit losses will approach the $2 trillion level is becoming more and more likely. Rising numbers of job losses, which have accelerated sharply in the fourth quarter, show no signs of abating heading into 2009. Together with the expected wave of business failures this year, additional losses in the $500 billion to $700 billion range on bad loans and credit provisions can be expected.

Most agree the TARP was successful in one aspect: the banking system has been stabilized and the risk of systemic failure has been averted. But as more consumers default on mortgages, credit cards and auto loans while business loans, commercial real estate mortgages and leveraged private equity deals go sour, it will become more and more likely to see additional pressures mount on all the big banks.

Acknowledging how unhappy congress is with the way the first part of the TARP money was spent, Mr. Bernanke said he could see why lawmakers would be “understandably concerned” that banks were receiving money when troubled homeowners and other businesses were not. But he justified further cash injections into the banks, saying “this disparate treatment, unappealing as it is, appears unavoidable. Our economic system is critically dependent on the free flow of credit.”

The implied message from Mr. Bernanke is very clear; the banks will be under increasing pressures in 2009 from further loan losses and increased credit provisions, which directly affects their tier 1 ratios. The financial system will become threatened once again as losses mount. Without either further capital injections or a plan to take these troubled assets off bank balance sheets, credit will not return to normal and the economy will continue to decline. A fiscal stimulus by itself will not be enough to return the economy to normal.  Read the original article.

  • Share/Bookmark

Building Credit After Filing for Bankruptcy

Author: admin - Categories: Bankruptcy News, Debt Relief Articles, Debt Settlement News - Tags: , , ,
SafeOnlineCash.com

In light of the credit crunch and the wave of foreclosures that have swept the country, buying a house after bankruptcy has become a lot more difficult. In most cases, mortgage lenders  not offer a home loan for someone who has filed bankruptcy in the last two years. Getting a home loan after that will largely depend on the size of the down payment you can make and whether your income is verifiable. That being said, even then the mortgage loan you will qualify for will likely have high mortgage rates and monthly payment. This being the case, maintaining on time payments and perfect credit history after bankruptcy is extremely important. Even the slightest sign of consistently delinquent payments, overuse of credit, or having too much debt and your eligibility for a mortgage loan will be thrown into question. Unfortunately, the subprime mortgage crisis has made life after bankruptcy even more difficult.

 

If you have already filed, there is no reason to dwell on the credit impact. Instead, you should start focusing on the ways that you can start improving it. Despite what you may have heard, removing a bankruptcy from your credit is unlikely (unless of course you filed Chapter 7 more than 10 years ago and it should be off your credit report anyway). Bankruptcy is intended to give you a fresh start, but from a credit standpoint, it will take time for you to rebound.

 

Here are a few tips to improve your credit score after filing for bankruptcy: First, always make on time payments to your creditors. Getting the credit in order to do this may be more difficult; however, getting secured credit cards or gas cards are easy ways to get credit again after declaring. Second, don’t max out your credit lines. This is a simple way for potential mortgage lenders to see if you have a problem abusing credit—if you are using the full line it is a huge warning sign that you may be a big spender. Third, don’t apply for too much credit. In the same light as the above, applying for several credit cards or loans at once is a warning sign you may be abusing your credit.  Read the original article >

 

  • Share/Bookmark
February 2, 2009

Noteworthy Credit Related News

Author: admin - Categories: Debt Relief Articles, Debt Settlement News, Editorial, Featured News Article - Tags: , , , , , , ,
SafeOnlineCash.com

I saw some credit related news this morning that was SO shocking that I felt I should share. On Good Morning America there was a segment about a man named Kevin Johnson. His father worked in the credit card industry, so Kevin is a very financially savvy guy because his dad taught him to manage his credit wisely. He pays his bills on time EVERY month and keeps his balances down. He is a homeowner and does everything that a consumer should do to keep his/her FICO credit scores up – keeping his debt to income ratio down, paying his bills on time and applying for credit only when he needs it. He got the opportunity to apply for an American Express Blue card and was approved. He had a credit line of $10,000, but was shocked to find that his credit line was recently slashed to $3,800 (probably what he owed them). The reason for this: WHERE he used the card.

 

When American Express slashed his credit line, they gave him the lame reason that he used his card somewhere where it has been observed that other people who have problems paying their bills have used theirs. Thus, they claimed he now is a risk of not paying his bills. They are engaging in behavioral analysis now. Apparently, now WHERE you shop and use your credit card can affect how much of a risk your creditor thinks you are. Because this has happened to someone with a stellar credit score, Good Morning America took it to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi because American Express received TARP funds. American Express was contacted for a comment, and they said they were trying to “balance servicing their card members while monitoring risk.” This is a company that took taxpayer money because they can’t manage their debt, but instead of using it to be able to lend to consumers, they, like other TARP recipients, are hoarding the money and coming up with MORE reasons to slash credit lines and NOT lend to consumers.

 

The credit card companies have been able to run carte blanche on consumers, slashing their credit lines for the lamest reasons. Mine have been repeatedly slashed because my creditors claim I have “seriously delinquent accounts”. These “seriously delinquent accounts” to which they are referring are ones that are 4.5 years old or older. Three of them are due to fall off my credit reports THIS YEAR due to age. I have one that drops off in May of this year, one in July and one in November. But, yet, the creditors are allowed to continue to punish me for these past financial problems that were actually a result of identity theft. Credit card companies REALLY need to be monitored, and now they are on the radar screen. Now, that it has happened to someone who is high-profile enough to have drawn attention, it will be interesting to see if these practices stop.  The Debt Settlement Nationwide Blog, recently posted some similar comments.

 

The key to all of this is that creditors have been doing behavioral analysis, which apparently affects people’s credit scores, without telling their customers. Kevin Johnson has created a website called “New Credit Rules” as a result of this.

 

Kevin Johnson apparently created a blog as a result of what happened to him. Here’s where the debt story came from:

I also checked and found out that MARKET CONDITIONS are among the ways creditors determine lending risks. So, with the market being in bad shape, consumers are taking it up the rear. Consumers are now also being punished for high balances and past financial mistakes, even if those mistakes are several years old or, in my case, the result of identity theft. Banks are getting away with writing their own rules on how they assess credit risk.

 

In the criminal justice system, a person cannot be punished twice for the same crime. It’s called “double jeopardy”. But, banks are allowed to continue to punish consumers again and again. Plus, they can also continue punishing for high balances that resulted from another creditor cutting credit lines down to what the balance is on a consumer’s credit card. Thus, the endless loop of having credit lines slashed and interest rates and fees jacked up to phenomenal rates on not just new purchases but also old balances continues. This makes it even more impossible for people to pay off their balances. I’m a good example of that because on one of my credit cards I quite literally pay more than twice the minimum payment each month, but my balance never goes down. My minimum payment on the card in question is $84. I pay $200 each month, but it doesn’t bring my balance down. Maybe this would somehow make a great article with a headline something like this: Banks Go Carte Blanche on the Taxpayer’s Dime

 

And, the article can go into some of the new ways banks scalp consumers and force them to pay for the bank’s mismanagement of their bottom line. Let me know what you think. – Maria Ny

  • Share/Bookmark